NSF award 2453331 · New Jersey Institute of Technology

SaTC: CORE: Small: Improving the Security of Large Language Model-Assisted Coding

Final report due

28 August 2029

in 1,045 days · The award ends on 30 April 2029.

GrantClerk is a private service. We are not NSF or any government agency.

Dates this award owes

NSF emails you about this too.

Decide about an extension31 Dec 2028in 805 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
This one is ours, not NSF’s.
Extension request16 Mar 2029in 880 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “at least 45 days prior to the end date”
No-cost extension notice20 Apr 2029in 915 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “at least ten calendar days prior to the end date”
Final report due28 Aug 2029in 1045 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “no later than 120-days following the end date of the award”
Project outcomes report due28 Aug 2029in 1045 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “no later than 120 days following the end date”
Award is closed out28 Aug 2029in 1045 days
award ending 2029-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “financially closed out 120 days after their expiration date”

Annual report dates come from the budget period on your award notice. That date is not public, so it is not shown here.

How we got this date

NSF lists this award's end date as 30 April 2029.
NSF rules say the final report is due no later than 120 days after that.
So the final report is due by 28 August 2029.

Read the rule on Research.gov

Get a note before each report date

Add this award to your desk. We email you before each date and keep the dates in one place.

Renews each year until you cancel. Cancel any time from your account.

Already a member? Sign in

Award card

Award number: 2453331
Period of support: 15 May 2026 – 30 Apr 2029
Amount: $450,000
Awardee: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ
Program: Secure &Trustworthy Cyberspace
Directorate: CSE

Abstract

Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted coding, where an LLM automatically generates code based on a developer-specified prompt, is already popular and projected to grow, promising to bolster coding productivity while reducing software development time and effort. LLM-generated code can be insecure for a variety of reasons, for example omitting critical security checks, or containing mistakes that adversaries can…

Is this right?

We copy this from the public NSF award record. Your award notice and NSF always win. If a date looks wrong, check Research.gov.