Skip to the ledger

GrantClerk

NSF award 2523384 · University of Pennsylvania

Collaborative Research: AIMing: Towards the Hadamard Conjecture: A Unified Neurosymbolic Reasoning and Formal Verification Paradigm

Final report due

29 December 2028

in 803 days · The award ends on 31 August 2028.

GrantClerk is a private service. We are not NSF or any government agency.

Dates this award owes

NSF emails you about this too.

  • Decide about an extension3 May 2028in 563 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

  • Extension request17 Jul 2028in 638 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

  • No-cost extension notice21 Aug 2028in 673 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

  • Final report due29 Dec 2028in 803 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

  • Project outcomes report due29 Dec 2028in 803 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

  • Award is closed out29 Dec 2028in 803 days

    award ending 2028-08-31 · Research.gov

Annual report dates come from the budget period on your award notice. That date is not public, so it is not shown here.

How we got this date

  1. NSF lists this award's end date as 31 August 2028.
  2. NSF rules say the final report is due no later than 120 days after that.
  3. So the final report is due by 29 December 2028.

Read the rule on Research.gov

Get a note before each report date

Add this award to your desk. We email you before each date and keep the dates in one place.

Renews each year until you cancel. Cancel any time from your account.

Already a member? Sign in

Award card

Award number
2523384
Period of support
1 Sep 2025 – 31 Aug 2028
Amount
$250,000
Awardee
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Program
OFFICE OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY AC, MSPA-INTERDISCIPLINARY, Special Projects - CCF
Directorate
MPS

Abstract

This project aims to develop a new artificial intelligence system that works alongside mathematicians to tackle problems that have resisted solutions for nearly a century. Recent advances in large language models can generate creative insights and partial reasoning steps, but they often make mistakes and cannot guarantee correctness. In contrast, traditional tools for verifying mathematical proofs offer rigorous…

Is this right?

We copy this from the public NSF award record. Your award notice and NSF always win. If a date looks wrong, check Research.gov.