Skip to the ledger

GrantClerk

NSF award 2555745 · Louisiana State University

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Approach for Interpretation of Piezocone Tests Based on Cavity Expansion and Consolidation Theory

Final report due

30 April 2030

in 1,290 days · The award ends on 31 December 2029.

GrantClerk is a private service. We are not NSF or any government agency.

Dates this award owes

NSF emails you about this too.

  • Decide about an extension2 Sep 2029in 1050 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

  • Extension request16 Nov 2029in 1125 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

  • No-cost extension notice21 Dec 2029in 1160 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

  • Final report due30 Apr 2030in 1290 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

  • Project outcomes report due30 Apr 2030in 1290 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

  • Award is closed out30 Apr 2030in 1290 days

    award ending 2029-12-31 · Research.gov

Annual report dates come from the budget period on your award notice. That date is not public, so it is not shown here.

How we got this date

  1. NSF lists this award's end date as 31 December 2029.
  2. NSF rules say the final report is due no later than 120 days after that.
  3. So the final report is due by 30 April 2030.

Read the rule on Research.gov

Get a note before each report date

Add this award to your desk. We email you before each date and keep the dates in one place.

Renews each year until you cancel. Cancel any time from your account.

Already a member? Sign in

Award card

Award number
2555745
Period of support
1 Jan 2027 – 31 Dec 2029
Amount
$349,723
Awardee
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Program
ECI-Engineering for Civil Infr
Directorate
ENG

Abstract

This award addresses a critical gap in the modeling and interpretation of the fundamental piezocone test for geotechnical analysis and design. The cone penetrometer test is an efficient method for (inversely) determining key soil properties in situ. However, the current achievements made on the cone penetration interpretation are largely based on empirical correlations, rather than on a rigorous theoretical…

Is this right?

We copy this from the public NSF award record. Your award notice and NSF always win. If a date looks wrong, check Research.gov.