NSF award 2541053 · University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

CAREER: Enhancing Software Testing by Generating, Suggesting, and Maintaining Carved Tests

Final report due

28 August 2031

in 1,774 days · The award ends on 30 April 2031.

GrantClerk is a private service. We are not NSF or any government agency.

Dates this award owes

NSF emails you about this too.

Decide about an extension31 Dec 2030in 1534 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
This one is ours, not NSF’s.
Extension request16 Mar 2031in 1609 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “at least 45 days prior to the end date”
No-cost extension notice20 Apr 2031in 1644 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “at least ten calendar days prior to the end date”
Final report due28 Aug 2031in 1774 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “no later than 120-days following the end date of the award”
Project outcomes report due28 Aug 2031in 1774 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “no later than 120 days following the end date”
Award is closed out28 Aug 2031in 1774 days
award ending 2031-04-30 · Research.gov
PAPPG 24-1: “financially closed out 120 days after their expiration date”

Annual report dates come from the budget period on your award notice. That date is not public, so it is not shown here.

How we got this date

NSF lists this award's end date as 30 April 2031.
NSF rules say the final report is due no later than 120 days after that.
So the final report is due by 28 August 2031.

Read the rule on Research.gov

Get a note before each report date

Add this award to your desk. We email you before each date and keep the dates in one place.

Renews each year until you cancel. Cancel any time from your account.

Already a member? Sign in

Award card

Award number: 2541053
Period of support: 1 May 2026 – 30 Apr 2031
Amount: $679,996
Awardee: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Program: Software & Hardware Foundation
Directorate: CSE

Abstract

Software quality is critical to the success of software systems, and effective testing practices are key to achieving high quality. Yet, many organizations continue to struggle to release high-quality software because they often rely heavily on large end-to-end tests that validate complete user workflows, making it difficult and costly to verify frequent code changes effectively. The project’s novelties are…

Is this right?

We copy this from the public NSF award record. Your award notice and NSF always win. If a date looks wrong, check Research.gov.